Where the children live after separation — and how much they see the other parent — is decided by agreement where possible and by a child arrangements order where not. Children's own views matter more with every year of age, though no child under 16 gets an outright veto. This guide explains "lives with" and "spends time with" orders, what age a child's choice starts to carry weight, the welfare test, and the reform now before Parliament.
On This Page
Where the Children Live, and Who Decides
Most separated parents settle their children's arrangements without a judge, through discussion, a parenting plan or mediation. The court's role is the backstop: where agreement fails or safety requires it, a child arrangements order fixes where a child lives and the time they spend with each parent, decided on the child's welfare rather than either parent's claims.
No child under 16 can legally decide which parent to live with. Courts weigh a child's wishes and feelings in light of age and understanding: around 10 to 11 they carry real weight, by 12 to 14 they are often close to decisive, and courts rarely force a capable teenager against clear, settled views — but welfare, not choice, remains the test.
Child Arrangements Orders
A child arrangements order under section 8 of the Children Act 1989 replaced the old "custody", "residence" and "contact" orders. One order can regulate both limbs: who the child lives with, and when they spend time with the other parent — in person, overnight, by phone or video.
"Lives With" Versus "Spends Time With"
The labels matter practically: a parent named as "lives with" can take the child abroad for up to a month without the other's consent, and shared "lives with" orders — the child living with both parents in defined proportions — are increasingly common where practical circumstances support them. Neither label changes parental responsibility, which both parents usually keep in full.
The Legal Framework — and the Reform Before Parliament
Decisions run on the welfare principle in section 1 of the Children Act 1989: the child's welfare is the court's paramount consideration, tested through the statutory welfare checklist. Since 2014 the Act has also contained a presumption that each parent's involvement furthers the child's welfare, unless the contrary is shown.
Presumption Repeal: Proposed, Not Yet Law
Following its review of the presumption of parental involvement, the government announced in October 2025 that it would repeal section 1(2A), and the measure is now before Parliament in the Courts and Tribunals Bill. Until that Bill passes and the repeal is commenced, the presumption remains the law. The direction of travel is clear, though: safety concerns are to be weighed without a statutory thumb on the scale, and courts already apply Practice Direction 12J rigorously where abuse is alleged.
Children's Views, Age by Age
What Age Can a Child Decide?
The honest answer: 16, in the sense that orders normally run out then — and no fixed age before that. In practice, courts treat views on a sliding scale. A 9 or 10-year-old's wishes are listened to and weighed against the reasons behind them; at 12 to 14 a considered preference is hard to displace; and forcing a capable 15-year-old into arrangements they reject is usually both wrong and futile. Cafcass officers ascertain views through age-appropriate conversations, so children are heard without being put in the witness box — or in the middle.
Applying for an Order
Unless an exemption applies — domestic abuse evidence, urgency — you must attend a mediation information and assessment meeting before applying. The application is form C100, with a £270 fee from 13 July 2026; Cafcass runs safeguarding checks before the first hearing, and most cases settle at or before the dispute resolution stage rather than at a contested final hearing.
The Pathfinder Model
A reformed, investigative "Pathfinder" court model — the court gathering information up front, with the child's voice at the centre — has been expanding nationally after pilots produced faster, less adversarial outcomes. Expect children cases to look progressively less like litigation and more like structured problem-solving as the rollout continues.
Arrangements on Divorce
Divorce itself decides nothing about children: there is no "custody hearing" built into the divorce process, and courts only make children orders where there is a dispute or a safety need. Most divorcing parents record arrangements in a parenting plan, and deal with money separately — child maintenance runs through its own statutory scheme regardless of what the divorce court orders.
How the Welfare Test Is Applied
- The child's wishes and feelings, in light of age and understanding
- Physical, emotional and educational needs, and the effect of any change
- Age, sex, background and any relevant characteristics
- Any harm suffered or at risk of being suffered
- Each parent's capability, and the range of orders available
Where abuse is alleged, the court may hold a fact-finding hearing first, and proven findings shape everything that follows. Wider family can apply too — see our guide to grandparents' rights.
Mediation and Settling Out of Court
Mediation is faster, cheaper and less scarring than proceedings, and the £500 family mediation voucher scheme supports child-arrangement cases. A mediated agreement can be made binding as a consent order. Where the other parent will not engage or an order is already being breached, the court route — including enforcement — remains open, and our child arrangements team can run either track.
Frequently askedQuestions about children's living arrangements
At what age can a child decide which parent to live with in the UK?
No age under 16 gives a legal right to choose. Views gain weight with maturity: they are heard from around 7 or 8, carry real influence by 10 to 12, and are often practically decisive at 14 or 15 — but the court's test remains the child's welfare, not the child's vote.
Can a 10, 12 or 14-year-old choose which parent to live with?
A 10-year-old's settled wishes are taken seriously but can be outweighed; a 12-year-old's considered preference is hard to displace; a 14-year-old's clear views usually prevail unless welfare points firmly the other way. In every case the court asks why the child holds the view, not just what it is.
What is the difference between "lives with" and "spends time with"?
Both are limbs of one child arrangements order. "Lives with" fixes the child's home — and lets that parent take the child abroad for up to a month without consent — while "spends time with" sets the other parent's time. Shared lives-with orders split the home between both.
Has the presumption of parental involvement been abolished?
Not yet. The government announced repeal in October 2025 and the measure is in the Courts and Tribunals Bill before Parliament, but section 1(2A) remains in force until the Bill passes and commences. Courts already restrict involvement where it would put a child at risk.
How do I apply for a child arrangements order?
Attend a mediation information meeting unless exempt, then apply on form C100 with the £270 fee. Cafcass completes safeguarding checks before the first hearing, and most cases settle before a final contested hearing. Urgent safety cases can be issued without notice.
Tell us the current pattern, your child's age and what each parent wants. We will tell you what a court would likely do and the fastest route to a workable arrangement.
Get Expert Advice